|
Collecting schoolwide data is a time-consuming but worthwhile
task. It is essential that the team's work be shared and that
instructional goals are based in data collected. Some data
analysis tools are available to facilitate this work.
- Data-Analysis Tool
Two tools are available to facilitate your work:
- The Florida School Report© (FSR), is an online data analysis tool,
developed by the Council for Educational Change. It can assist in analyzing
your school's data. The data display looks at a schools' performance by
subject and grade level and can help in understanding student performance
trends. It also compares schools based on similar demographics and school
characteristics. All members of the faculty can use this tool to determine
for themselves the current reality of their school’s performance.
The greatest understanding is derived from the learning we do ourselves,
and to that end, every faculty member can be more committed if they personally
asses their school’s relative performance. Print and use
the (worksheet/handoutFlorida
School Report Data Analysis Tool) to record your school information.
Link to www.floridaschoolreport.org and
select School Data as your starting point to research your school.
SP SnapShot is a data analysis tool developed by the Council for
Educational Change. SP SnapShot displays data at both the
classroom and individual student level. This tool will assist
in computing learning
gains (AYP), identifying learning needs student-by-student and
providing critical NCLB information. For information on this
tool contact the Council
for Educational Change or visit the website, www.studentperformance.com.
- Set Goals Based on Data
According to Schmoker, the key to building knowledge
is to focus on assessed standards, set a limited number
of
measurable achievement goals in the lowest scoring
subjects or courses, and target specific standards
within those
courses
or subjects that require added attention. Develop and
refine instructional strategies that target those specific
skills,
and then measure results. Avoid generating a long list
of
action steps with no relation to student data. Such
steps steal time that could be used to affect student
performance.
Schmoker says the key is to "concentrate on how teams
of teachers can improve instruction in areas of lowest performanceoften
one at a timeto reach measurable goals" (JSD,
Spring 2002, p.12).
In summary:
- Examine your data and set a few measurable goals
- Identify the areas of lowest performance from
the data
- Find, create, and refine better ways to teach those
skills
- Share the Team's Work
The faculty data collected regarding the school's culture
(Module 1 Leading Change) should be posted in the faculty
lounge or other teacher congregation area to keep in
sight the targets and progress toward attaining them.
Leadership Teams are responsible for collecting
and disaggregating the school-wide assessment data
and, after careful discussion and analysis, identify
what information is most meaningful to faculty. Using
bullet points or talking points when sharing this
information with Learning Teams, not only helps communicate
change, but also helps build coherence. Simply dumping
the data on faculty can create confusion and detachment.
School-wide data will include all standardized test
data (disaggregated) and other schoolwide "snapshots" that
can be captured by information such as:
- discipline
referrals
- dropout rates
- absentee/tardy rates
- course failure rates
- retention rates
- mainstreaming rates
- faculty attrition
- geographical/residential map
- student honors/awards
- advanced course demographics
- performance of feeder
schools
- free/reduced lunch
- limited English proficiency
- writing samples of
entering students
- community partnerships
- class size variations

Next: 2.
Form Measurable Goals: Strategic and Action
|
|