|
If Knowledge is Power, and the development
of realistic assessment of the school’s status and
the development of an action plan can have immediate results
on improving
school and student
performance, then, knowledge may also be a powerful catalyst
for faculty and professional learning.
Learning Teams, comprised of teachers who naturally work
together daily, provide a learning process that may redefine
the teacher’s job description: Teaching goes beyond “what
I do in my classroom” to include “sharing my
discoveries of what works with my colleagues—and learning
from them.” Group learning and group sharing, embraced
by collegial relationships alluded to in Module 1: Leading
Change (Continuous Improvement), accelerate discovery and
reinforce the Action Goals. Indeed, the axiom that Knowledge
is Power translates; in this case, to knowledge is the power
to improve education for students and faculty alike.
The introduction of new ideas, concepts, or strategies is
not always without resistance and can create 'cognitive dissonance'
or disarray between colleagues. To keep the process of building
knowledge vital, the Leadership Team should be prepared to
facilitate the resolution of this dissonance. Resolution is
best found in Learning Team discussions—rather than
through a speaker’s presentation, video, or packaged
staff development kit. Furthermore, group discussion aids
in the assimilation of the information and the resulting application
to the classroom.
Consider the research of Bruce Joyce and Beverly Showers
(1988). They found that too many leaders believed that teacher
behavior could be changed by workshops. Training in workshops
can be a powerful catalyst for change, but only if it is accompanied
by modeling, practice with feedback, and on-site follow-up.
As Joyce and Showers found, (worksheet/handout—Relationship
Between Levels of Impact and Components of Learning) workshops
are 90% ineffective if they stand-alone. When the
workshops include presentation of theory, modeling of desired
behaviors, low-risk practice with constructive feedback, and
the critical component of on-site follow-up (through coaching,
peer visits, or study teams), such training can be 90% effective
in its transfer to the classroom. This research is a strong
argument for the establishment of Learning Teams in a school
and for the use of those teams as the vehicle for building
the knowledge of teachers.

The activities in the following section will
facilitate faculty efforts to build and share knowledge over
time. Five critical steps in building knowledge for continuous
improvement are:
- Provide Professional
Learning for the Leadership Team
- Design a Schoolwide
Professional Learning Curriculum and Calendar
- Prioritize Brain-based
Teaching and Learning as Core Content of Professional Learning
- Prioritize Action Research
as Core Content of Professional Learning
- Evaluate Schoolwide
Professional Learning Plans
Next: 1.
Provide Professional Learning for the Leadership Team
|
|